Adventure Travel
Turning Back: The Critical Decision in High-Altitude Adventures
2024-06-19

In the world of outdoor exploration, high-altitude activities like hiking and climbing often come with inherent risks. Two harrowing incidents highlight the importance of recognizing when to turn back for safety. In one case, a man nearly lost his life due to altitude sickness while hiking in Kings Canyon National Park. In another, a friend's condition deteriorated rapidly during a snowshoe trip near Vail, Colorado. Both experiences serve as stark reminders that pushing forward despite warning signs can lead to severe consequences. These stories emphasize the need for hikers to prioritize safety over reaching their destination, especially in challenging environments.

A Night to Remember: A Close Call in Kings Canyon

In a remote corner of Kings Canyon National Park, under the vast expanse of a starlit sky, an archaeology crew was conducting a survey deep within the wilderness. It was early summer, and the Bubbs Creek Trail, part of the popular Rae Lakes Loop, was teeming with adventurers. On the first night of an eight-week project, the head archaeologist joined the team to bid farewell. Little did they know, this night would be etched in memory for reasons far beyond their expectations.

As darkness fell, panic erupted when a woman rushed into camp, shouting that her partner was seizing in a nearby tent. Thanks to the foresight of bringing a two-way radio, emergency services were quickly alerted. Rangers arrived with specialized equipment, including a stretcher equipped with mountain bike tires, to transport the debilitated man down the rugged trail. Despite his ongoing seizures, he was airlifted to safety in Fresno and made a full recovery days later.

It emerged that three days prior, the man had embarked on the Rae Lakes Loop with a new acquaintance. They had driven up from sea level and started hiking midday, unaware of the dangers lurking at higher altitudes. By the second day, nearing 10,000 feet, symptoms of altitude sickness began to manifest. Instead of turning back, they pressed on, crossing Glen Pass at over 11,000 feet, ultimately leading to a life-threatening situation.

The Snowy Descent: A Lesson Near Vail

Years later, a similar scenario unfolded near Vail, Colorado. Neil, a seasoned outdoorsman, flew in from the Bay Area the night before a planned five-mile snowshoe trip. The journey began at 9,000 feet, eventually crossing Resolution Saddle at nearly 12,000 feet. As the group trudged through heavy snowfall, Neil's stamina waned significantly—an unusual occurrence for him. Despite growing concerns, the urge to reach the hut and enjoy its comforts overshadowed caution.

Midway through the trek, Neil admitted to feeling nauseous and weak. At this critical juncture, turning back should have been the priority. However, the group continued, rationalizing their decision based on the time and effort already invested. Neil managed to reach the hut but spent the night in a dire state, struggling with wet, erratic breathing and powerful headaches. The next morning, a Forest Service worker diagnosed potential HAPE (High Altitude Pulmonary Edema), prompting an urgent descent.

The Sunk Cost Fallacy: A Dangerous Mindset

Both incidents underscore the perilous nature of the sunk cost fallacy—the tendency to persist in a course of action because of the resources already committed. In high-altitude environments, this mindset can be fatal. Recognizing the early signs of altitude sickness and making the difficult decision to turn back is crucial. Outdoor enthusiasts must prioritize safety over achieving their goals, understanding that an unfinished trip is far better than one marred by injury or worse.

As we venture into the wild, it's essential to plan with a built-in turning point, ensuring that safety remains paramount. The lessons learned from these close calls remind us that sometimes, the bravest decision is knowing when to retreat.

More Stories